The textbooks speak of the radiometric dating techniques, and the dates themselves, as factual information.Far from being data, these dates are actually interpretations of the data.When I first became interested in the creation-evolution debate, in late 1994, I looked around for sources that clearly and simply explained what radiometric dating is and why young-Earth creationists are driven to discredit it.I found several good sources, but none that seemed both complete enough to stand alone and simple enough for a What is radiometric dating?All sorts of interesting data are being uncovered that challenge the supposedly “rock-solid” idea that the earth is billions of years old.One of the more recent developments is the carbon dating of bones and other carbon-containing materials that are supposedly millions of years old.
Knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming?
So, if we measure the rate of beta decay in an organic sample, we can calculate how old the sample is. Question: Kieth and Anderson radiocarbon-dated the shell of a living freshwater mussel and obtained an age of over two thousand years.
ICR creationists claim that this discredits C-14 dating. Answer: It does discredit the C-14 dating of freshwater mussels, but that's about all.
Surprisingly, the study includes from several different locations!
Radiocarbon dating can easily establish that humans have been on the earth for over twenty thousand years, at least twice as long as creationists are willing to allow.